Hudson, Mallaney & Shindler PC
Call Us Today (515) 223-4567
Personal Injury
Family Law
Bankruptcy
Business Law

5015 Grand Ridge Dr.
Suite 100
West Des Moines, IA 50265

Phone: (515) 223-4567
Fax: (515) 223-8887

PrintPrint This Page
E-MailE-Mail This Page

News & Information

News


Personal Injury
[08/19] NY state firefighters deliver 3 babies in transit
[08/19] Suit accuses restaurant of giving man big tapeworm
[08/19] Sailor, knocked from boat, rescued 12 hours later
[08/14] Calif. mom gives birth on front lawn by herself
[08/01] Boy, 4, tries to drive to grandma's house, crashes
More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

  Case Summaries


Injury & Tort Law

[08/28] Northland Casualty Co. v. Meeks
In an insurance claim by estate of plaintiffs in which defendant-insurer's coverage excluded claims by employees, grant of summary judgment to defendant insurance company is affirmed where: 1) there were no genuine issues of material fact; and 2) the district court correctly determined that the deceased was an employee and not a temporary worker as defined by the insurance policy.

[08/28] Harrison v. Ash, C.O.
In a claim by the estate of plaintiff-inmate, serving 35-day sentence for failure to pay child support, who died after a severe asthma attack in a county jail, judgment denying qualified immunity with respect to defendant officers is reversed and nurses' appeal for lack of jurisdiction is dismissed where: 1) defendant officers were not deliberately indifferent to plaintiff's medical needs because they reasonably responded to his requests for medical attention in a timely manner and defendant officers were entitled to rely upon the medical treatment of nurses once they obtained medical care for plaintiff; and 2) purposes of qualified immunity do not support the extension of the doctrine to nurses employed by a private medical provider.

[08/27] Khorrami v. Rolince
In a suit alleging violations of due-process rights by government agents who detained plaintiff while investigating the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, an interlocutory appeal of the denial of a grant of qualified immunity to defendants is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction where the district court's deferral of a ruling on the government's qualified immunity motion was not equivalent to a denial of the motion.
More...

Firm Overview|  Practice Areas|  Attorney Profiles|  Representative Cases|  Internet Resources|  News andInformation|
 Contact Us| Home

© 2008 Hudson, Mallaney & Shindler P.C